[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6487016.ESlEkJNu7c@pc-42>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:13:14 +0000
From: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix various compilation issues with wfx driver
On Tuesday 8 October 2019 17:10:56 CEST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 09:42:47AM +0000, Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> > From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> >
> > Most of problems are related to big-endian architectures.
>
> kbuild still reports 2 errors with these patches applied:
>
> Regressions in current branch:
>
> drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c:82:2-8: preceding lock on line 65
As I replied to Julia, this behavior is intended.
> drivers/staging/wfx/main.c:188:14-21: ERROR: PTR_ERR applied after initialization to constant on line 183
This is a false positive, as confirmed by Dan.
You may also notice:
drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c:207 wfx_scan_work() warn: inconsistent returns 'sem:&wvif->scan.lock'
I also consider it as a false positive.
> Can you please fix those up as well?
Beside these ones, I will address the other reported problems.
--
Jérôme Pouiller
Powered by blists - more mailing lists