linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Skip balancing of the enabled regulators in regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Oct 2019 12:59:13 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Skip balancing of the enabled
 regulators in regulator_enable()

On 09-10-19, 15:13, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> 
> > Okay, then what is the conclusion, as I got lost a bit? How do you want 
> > this issue to be fixed?
> 
> We should revert the enable call, it shouldn't be required, and ideally
> the default balancer could be updated to only make configuration changes
> if they're actually required which would help avoid triggering any such
> things in future if we don't absolutely have to.

Sorry for the delay in responding, just came back after vacations.

Should the OPP change be reverted ? Someone going to send that revert to me with
the required explanation ?

-- 
viresh