linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 104/114] arm64: Use firmware to detect CPUs that are not affected by Spectre-v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:36:51 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 104/114] arm64: Use firmware to detect CPUs that are not affected by Spectre-v2

From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>

commit 517953c2c47f9c00a002f588ac856a5bc70cede3 upstream.

The SMCCC ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 service can indicate that although the
firmware knows about the Spectre-v2 mitigation, this particular
CPU is not vulnerable, and it is thus not necessary to call
the firmware on this CPU.

Let's use this information to our benefit.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -198,22 +198,36 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void)
 	case PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC:
 		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
 				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-		if ((int)res.a0 < 0)
+		switch ((int)res.a0) {
+		case 1:
+			/* Firmware says we're just fine */
+			return 0;
+		case 0:
+			cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
+			/* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
+			smccc_start = NULL;
+			smccc_end = NULL;
+			break;
+		default:
 			return -1;
-		cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
-		/* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
-		smccc_start = NULL;
-		smccc_end = NULL;
+		}
 		break;
 
 	case PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC:
 		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
 				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-		if ((int)res.a0 < 0)
+		switch ((int)res.a0) {
+		case 1:
+			/* Firmware says we're just fine */
+			return 0;
+		case 0:
+			cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
+			smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
+			smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
+			break;
+		default:
 			return -1;
-		cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
-		smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
-		smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
+		}
 		break;
 
 	default: