lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:23:35 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     <jhs@...atatu.com>, <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] act_mirred: Fix mirred_init_module error
 handling

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:10:52 +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> If tcf_register_action failed, mirred_device_notifier
> should be unregistered.
> 
> Fixes: 3b87956ea645 ("net sched: fix race in mirred device removal")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>

Why does the subject say net-next, looks like the bug was introduced
all the way back in 2.6.36. For fixes for code which is already in
Linus'es main tree the subject should say [PATCH net]. Those are on the
fast path to the -rc releases and stable.

Applied to net, and queued for stable, please let me know if I
misunderstood the intention here.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ