lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:57:55 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>
Cc:     outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Remove comparisons to booleans
 in conditionals.

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:39:23AM +0300, Wambui Karuga wrote:
>  	if (is_primary_adapter(adapter))
>  		DBG_871X("IsBtDisabled =%d, IsBtControlLps =%d\n", hal_btcoex_IsBtDisabled(adapter), hal_btcoex_IsBtControlLps(adapter));
>  
> -	if ((adapter_to_pwrctl(adapter)->bFwCurrentInPSMode == true)
> -		&& (hal_btcoex_IsBtControlLps(adapter) == false)
> +	if ((adapter_to_pwrctl(adapter)->bFwCurrentInPSMode)
> +		&& !(hal_btcoex_IsBtControlLps(adapter))

Delete the extra parentheses as well, because they don't make sense when
we remove the == false comparison.  It's part of doing "one thing" is to
the whole thing and not leave bits undone.

		&& !hal_btcoex_IsBtControlLps(adapter)

>  		) {
>  		u8 bEnterPS;
>  
> @@ -2047,7 +2047,7 @@ static int rtw_check_join_candidate(struct mlme_priv *mlme
>  
>  
>  	/* check bssid, if needed */
> -	if (mlme->assoc_by_bssid == true) {
> +	if (mlme->assoc_by_bssid) {
>  		if (memcmp(competitor->network.MacAddress, mlme->assoc_bssid, ETH_ALEN))
>  			goto exit;
>  	}
> @@ -2805,7 +2805,6 @@ void rtw_update_ht_cap(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pie, uint ie_len, u8 channe
>  	struct mlme_ext_info *pmlmeinfo = &(pmlmeext->mlmext_info);
>  	u8 cbw40_enable = 0;
>  
> -
>  	if (!phtpriv->ht_option)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -2815,7 +2814,7 @@ void rtw_update_ht_cap(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pie, uint ie_len, u8 channe
>  	DBG_871X("+rtw_update_ht_cap()\n");
>  
>  	/* maybe needs check if ap supports rx ampdu. */
> -	if ((phtpriv->ampdu_enable == false) && (pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 1)) {
> +	if (!(phtpriv->ampdu_enable) && pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 1) {

Same.

>  		if (pregistrypriv->wifi_spec == 1) {
>  			/* remove this part because testbed AP should disable RX AMPDU */
>  			/* phtpriv->ampdu_enable = false; */

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ