lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ddcdfe7-7627-6181-7e28-c6d7d63c3e22@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:06:34 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] extcon: axp288: Move to swnodes

Hi,

On 10-10-2019 13:58, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:16:23PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> In any case, do we leave this series as it is now, or should I add two
>> patches to it - one that just removes device_connection_add/remove
>> functions without any other changes, and another patch that removes
>> that device_connection_find() function (together with generic_match
>> etc.)?
> 
> Forget about it. Let's leave this series as it is now.
> 
> The device_connection_find() function we can remove separately.

That sounds fine to me. Note as mentioned I would remove the
device_connection_find() function before removing the builtin
connection support, that will make the builtin connection support
removal patch a bit cleaner.

Regards,

Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ