[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:44:33 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:23:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:02:07 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I suspect -next will have to carry this semantic merge conflict
> > resolution until the DRM tree is merged upstream.
>
> Yep, its not a real problem, I get a few like this every cycle.
Yeah totally within expectations when I acked that cleanup patch. We'll
probably have a few more lockdep annotation patches/changes that will
conflict in drm.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists