[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPnx3XNGBw+SKSFA3DhhHFZZ17f54DMfYjKOcqYTb3N-PWGKpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:19:28 +0800
From: Candle Sun <candlesea@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
orson.zhai@...soc.com,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Candle Sun <candle.sun@...soc.com>,
Nianfu Bai <nianfu.bai@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: core: check whether usage page item is after
usage id item
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:00 AM Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
>
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> > > index 3eaee2c..3394222 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> > >
> > > #include "hid-ids.h"
> > >
> > > +#define GET_COMPLETE_USAGE(page, id) (((page) << 16) + ((id) & 0xffff))
> >
> > Not sure I like the macro. I'd rather have the explicit code. That said, lets
> > see what Benjamin has to say.
>
> Not sure about Benjamin :) but I personally would ask for putting it
> somewhere into hid.h as static inline.
>
> And even if it's for some reason insisted on this staying macro, please at
> least put it as close to the place(s) it's being used as possible, in
> order to maintain some code sanity.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
>
Thanks Nicolas and Jiri,
If macro is not good, I will change it to static function. But the
funciton is only used in hid-core.c,
maybe placing it into hid.h is not good?
Regards,
Candle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists