[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <36C2B5DF-7F21-42C6-BA77-6D86EDCB6BB3@lca.pw>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 19:35:57 -0400
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com,
kernel@...ccoli.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: Add nohugepages parameter to prevent hugepages creation
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 6:40 PM, Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Kdump kernels won't benefit from hugepages - in fact it's quite opposite,
> it may be the case hugepages on kdump kernel can lead to OOM if kernel
> gets unable to allocate demanded pages due to the fact the preallocated
> hugepages are consuming a lot of memory.
>
> This patch proposes a new kernel parameter to prevent the creation of
> HugeTLB hugepages - we currently don't have a way to do that. We can
> even have kdump scripts removing the kernel command-line options to
> set hugepages, but it's not straightforward to prevent sysctl/sysfs
> configuration, given it happens in later boot or anytime when the
> system is running.
Typically, kdump kernel has its own initramfs, and don’t even need to mount a rootfs, so I can’t see how sysfs/sysctl is relevant here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists