linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: anx7625: Add anx7625 MIPI DSI/DPI to DP bridge driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 02:08:50 +0000
From:   Xin Ji <xji@...logixsemi.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:     "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Sheng Pan <span@...logixsemi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: anx7625: Add anx7625 MIPI DSI/DPI to
 DP bridge driver

Hi Dan Carpenter,

This is a bug, I'll fix it right now.

The coding is much nicer than before, thanks for your comments,
it is very helpful for me.

Thanks,
Xin


On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:56:17PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:53:15PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This code is *so* much nicer than before.  I hope you feel good about
> > the changes.  It makes me happy to look at this code now.
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 09:34:19AM +0000, Xin Ji wrote:
> > > +static int edid_read(struct anx7625_data *ctx,
> > > +		     u8 offset, u8 *pblock_buf)
> > > +{
> > > +	int ret, cnt;
> > > +	struct device *dev = &ctx->client->dev;
> > > +
> > > +	for (cnt = 0; cnt < EDID_TRY_CNT; cnt++) {
>                                           ^^^^^
> 
> > > +		sp_tx_aux_wr(ctx, offset);
> > > +		/* set I2C read com 0x01 mot = 0 and read 16 bytes */
> > > +		ret = sp_tx_aux_rd(ctx, 0xf1);
> > > +
> > > +		if (ret) {
> > > +			sp_tx_rst_aux(ctx);
> > > +			DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dev, "edid read failed, reset!\n");
> > > +			cnt++;
>                         ^^^^^
> 
> I mean that it's incremented twice, yeah?
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter