[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191011070126.GU2328@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:01:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/ftrace: Use text_poke()
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:10:47AM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> Currently, ftrace_rec entries are ordered inside the group of functions, but
> "groups of function" are not ordered. So, the current int3 handler does a (*):
We can insert a sort() of the vector right before doing
text_poke_bp_batch() of course...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists