[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e99e07c2-88c6-e4d8-af80-c46d36bc6cd0@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:16:28 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, joro@...tes.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, will@...nel.org
Cc: vdumpa@...dia.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Add an optional "input-address-size"
property
On 2019-10-11 4:46 am, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> This series of patches add an optional DT property to allow an SoC to
> specify how many bits being physically connected to its SMMU instance,
> depending on the SoC design.
This has come up before, and it doesn't work in general because a single
SMMU instance can have many master interfaces, with potentially
different sizes of address bus wired up to each. It's also a
conceptually-wrong approach anyway, since this isn't a property of the
SMMU; it's a property of the interconnect(s) upstream of the SMMU.
IIRC you were working on Tegra - if so, Thierry already has a plan, see
this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190930133510.GA1904140@ulmo/
Robin.
>
> Nicolin Chen (2):
> dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add an optional "input-address-size" property
> iommu/arm-smmu: Read optional "input-address-size" property
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 7 +++++++
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists