linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/19] EDAC, mc: Reduce indentation level in edac_mc_handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:17:11 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] EDAC, mc: Reduce indentation level in
 edac_mc_handle_error()

Em Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:25:14 +0000
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com> escreveu:

> Reduce the indentation level in edac_mc_handle_error() a bit by using
> continue. No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> index f2cbca77bc50..45b02bb31964 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> @@ -1171,37 +1171,38 @@ void edac_mc_handle_error(const enum hw_event_mc_err_type type,
>  		 * channel/memory controller/...  may be affected.
>  		 * Also, don't show errors for empty DIMM slots.
>  		 */
> -		if (e->enable_per_layer_report && dimm->nr_pages) {
> -			if (n_labels >= EDAC_MAX_LABELS) {
> -				e->enable_per_layer_report = false;
> -				break;
> -			}
> -			n_labels++;
> -			if (p != e->label) {
> -				strcpy(p, OTHER_LABEL);
> -				p += strlen(OTHER_LABEL);
> -			}
> -			strcpy(p, dimm->label);
> -			p += strlen(p);
> -			*p = '\0';
> +		if (!e->enable_per_layer_report || !dimm->nr_pages)
> +			continue;
>  
> -			/*
> -			 * get csrow/channel of the DIMM, in order to allow
> -			 * incrementing the compat API counters
> -			 */
> -			edac_dbg(4, "%s csrows map: (%d,%d)\n",
> -				 mci->csbased ? "rank" : "dimm",
> -				 dimm->csrow, dimm->cschannel);
> -			if (row == -1)
> -				row = dimm->csrow;
> -			else if (row >= 0 && row != dimm->csrow)
> -				row = -2;
> -
> -			if (chan == -1)
> -				chan = dimm->cschannel;
> -			else if (chan >= 0 && chan != dimm->cschannel)
> -				chan = -2;
> +		if (n_labels >= EDAC_MAX_LABELS) {
> +			e->enable_per_layer_report = false;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		n_labels++;
> +		if (p != e->label) {
> +			strcpy(p, OTHER_LABEL);
> +			p += strlen(OTHER_LABEL);
>  		}
> +		strcpy(p, dimm->label);
> +		p += strlen(p);
> +		*p = '\0';
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * get csrow/channel of the DIMM, in order to allow
> +		 * incrementing the compat API counters
> +		 */
> +		edac_dbg(4, "%s csrows map: (%d,%d)\n",
> +			mci->csbased ? "rank" : "dimm",
> +			dimm->csrow, dimm->cschannel);
> +		if (row == -1)
> +			row = dimm->csrow;
> +		else if (row >= 0 && row != dimm->csrow)
> +			row = -2;
> +
> +		if (chan == -1)
> +			chan = dimm->cschannel;
> +		else if (chan >= 0 && chan != dimm->cschannel)
> +			chan = -2;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!e->enable_per_layer_report) {



Thanks,
Mauro