[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fef7f3d-984e-9011-b207-c7f287691000@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:58:13 +0530
From: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC)
driver for SC7180
Hi Stephen,
On 10/10/2019 9:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2019-10-09 02:19:39)
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 10/5/2019 4:50 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Taniya Das (2019-10-04 10:39:31)
>>>>
>>>> Could you please confirm if you are referring to update the below?
>>>
>>> I wasn't suggesting that explicitly but sure. Something like this would
>>> be necessary to make clk_get() pass back a NULL pointer to the caller.
>>> Does everything keep working with this change?
>>>
>>
>> Even if I pass back NULL, I don't see it working. Please suggest how to
>> take it forward.
>>
>
> Why doesn't it work?
>
My bad, I messed up with the kernel and my testing was showing failures.
Have tested it on SC7180 & Cheza and it works as expected.
I will submit the changes in common.c to return NULL.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists