[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191011213610.5943cdea@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:36:10 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the staging.current
tree
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:29:02 +0200 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:10:23AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > Hi Stephen
> >
> > Sorry, I've clearly let another one of these through.
> >
> > Stupid question of the day. Don't suppose you can share how you check these?
>
> There's a script, that I posted to the workflows mailing list, that
> should check these, based on Stephen's script.
>
> But it didn't seem to catch this problem, which is odd, I must have
> messed something up...
Attached is my script. It takes a range of commits to check. Usually
after I fetch a tree I pass it "^origin/master <old head of tree>...<new head of tree>".
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Download attachment "check_fixes" of type "application/x-shellscript" (4198 bytes)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists