linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/19] EDAC: Remove misleading comment in struct edac_raw_error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191011074940.30b0764b@coco.lan>
Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:49:40 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/19] EDAC: Remove misleading comment in struct
 edac_raw_error_desc

Em Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:25:26 +0000
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com> escreveu:

> There never has been such function edac_raw_error_desc_clean() and in
> function ghes_edac_report_mem_error() the whole struct is zero'ed
> including the string arrays. Remove that comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>

> ---
>  include/linux/edac.h | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/edac.h b/include/linux/edac.h
> index 8e72222e50b0..4d9673954856 100644
> --- a/include/linux/edac.h
> +++ b/include/linux/edac.h
> @@ -458,15 +458,10 @@ struct errcount_attribute_data {
>   * @other_detail:		other driver-specific detail about the error
>   */
>  struct edac_raw_error_desc {
> -	/*
> -	 * NOTE: everything before grain won't be cleaned by
> -	 * edac_raw_error_desc_clean()
> -	 */
>  	char location[LOCATION_SIZE];
>  	char label[(EDAC_MC_LABEL_LEN + 1 + sizeof(OTHER_LABEL)) * EDAC_MAX_LABELS];
>  	long grain;
>  
> -	/* the vars below and grain will be cleaned on every new error report */
>  	u16 error_count;
>  	int top_layer;
>  	int mid_layer;



Thanks,
Mauro