[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191011082913.6514e126@coco.lan>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:29:13 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] EDAC, Documentation: Describe CPER module
definition and DIMM ranks
Em Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:25:42 +0000
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com> escreveu:
> Update on CPER DIMM naming convention and DIMM ranks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/ras.rst | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/ras.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/ras.rst
> index 2b20f5f7380d..26e02a59f0f4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/ras.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/ras.rst
> @@ -330,9 +330,12 @@ There can be multiple csrows and multiple channels.
>
> .. [#f4] Nowadays, the term DIMM (Dual In-line Memory Module) is widely
> used to refer to a memory module, although there are other memory
> - packaging alternatives, like SO-DIMM, SIMM, etc. Along this document,
> - and inside the EDAC system, the term "dimm" is used for all memory
> - modules, even when they use a different kind of packaging.
> + packaging alternatives, like SO-DIMM, SIMM, etc. The UEFI
> + specification (Version 2.7) defines a memory module in the Common
> + Platform Error Record (CPER) section to be an SMBIOS Memory Device
> + (Type 17). Along this document, and inside the EDAC system, the term
> + "dimm" is used for all memory modules, even when they use a
> + different kind of packaging.
>
> Memory controllers allow for several csrows, with 8 csrows being a
> typical value. Yet, the actual number of csrows depends on the layout of
> @@ -349,12 +352,14 @@ controllers. The following example will assume 2 channels:
> | | ``ch0`` | ``ch1`` |
> +============+===========+===========+
> | ``csrow0`` | DIMM_A0 | DIMM_B0 |
> - +------------+ | |
> - | ``csrow1`` | | |
> + | | rank0 | rank0 |
> + +------------+ - | - |
> + | ``csrow1`` | rank1 | rank1 |
> +------------+-----------+-----------+
> | ``csrow2`` | DIMM_A1 | DIMM_B1 |
> - +------------+ | |
> - | ``csrow3`` | | |
> + | | rank0 | rank0 |
> + +------------+ - | - |
> + | ``csrow3`` | rank1 | rank1 |
> +------------+-----------+-----------+
>
> In the above example, there are 4 physical slots on the motherboard
> @@ -374,11 +379,13 @@ which the memory DIMM is placed. Thus, when 1 DIMM is placed in each
> Channel, the csrows cross both DIMMs.
>
> Memory DIMMs come single or dual "ranked". A rank is a populated csrow.
> -Thus, 2 single ranked DIMMs, placed in slots DIMM_A0 and DIMM_B0 above
> -will have just one csrow (csrow0). csrow1 will be empty. On the other
> -hand, when 2 dual ranked DIMMs are similarly placed, then both csrow0
> -and csrow1 will be populated. The pattern repeats itself for csrow2 and
> -csrow3.
> +In the example above 2 dual ranked DIMMs are similarly placed. Thus,
> +both csrow0 and csrow1 are populated. On the other hand, when 2 single
> +ranked DIMMs are placed in slots DIMM_A0 and DIMM_B0, then they will
> +have just one csrow (csrow0) and csrow1 will be empty. The pattern
> +repeats itself for csrow2 and csrow3. Also note that some memory
> +controller doesn't have any logic to identify the memory module, see
> +``rankX`` directories below.
>
> The representation of the above is reflected in the directory
> tree in EDAC's sysfs interface. Starting in directory
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists