linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:01:05 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/61] 4.14.149-stable review

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:14:59AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/10/19 9:29 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:12:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 10/10/19 1:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.149 release.
> > > > There are 61 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Sat 12 Oct 2019 08:29:51 AM UTC.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Preliminary.
> > > 
> > > I see several mips build failures.
> > > 
> > > arch/mips/kernel/proc.c: In function 'show_cpuinfo':
> > > arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h:352:31: error: implicit declaration of function '__ase'
> > 
> > Thanks, will go drop the lone mips patch that I think is causing this
> > problem.
> > 
> 
> Looks like it did. For v4.14.148-61-g6f45e0e87a75:
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 172 pass: 172 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 372 pass: 372 fail: 0

Great!  Thanks for running this and letting me know.

greg k-h