lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB7023FB0139BDB810B1400F6EEE970@VI1PR04MB7023.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:20:44 +0000
From:   Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To:     Joel Colledge <joel.colledge@...bit.com>
CC:     Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts/gdb: fix lx-dmesg when CONFIG_PRINTK_CALLER is
 set

On 11.10.2019 16:02, Joel Colledge wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:47 PM Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com> wrote:
>> This struct printk_log is quite small, I wonder if it's possible to do a
>> single read for each log entry? This might make lx-dmesg faster because
>> of fewer roundtrips to gdbserver and jtag (or whatever backend you're
>> using).
> 
> I think this is already covered. utils.read_memoryview uses
> inferior.read_memory and I think that reads the entire log buffer at
> once (at most 2 reads, one for each half).

You're right, sorry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ