lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191011143930.hs2pkz5i2bci7igs@steredhat>
Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:39:30 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Adit Ranadive <aditr@...are.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] vhost/vsock: don't allow half-closed socket in
 the host

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:26:34AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:07:58PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > vmci_transport never allowed half-closed socket on the host side.
> > In order to provide the same behaviour, we changed the
> > vhost_transport_stream_has_data() to return 0 (no data available)
> > if the peer (guest) closed the connection.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> 
> I don't think we should copy bugs like this.
> Applications don't actually depend on this VMCI limitation, in fact
> it looks like a working application can get broken by this.
> 
> So this looks like a userspace visible ABI change
> which we can't really do.
> 
> If it turns out some application cares, it can always
> fully close the connection. Or add an ioctl so the application
> can find out whether half close works.
> 

I got your point.
Discard this patch.

Thanks,
Stefano

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ