| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20191011182140.8353-1-andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:21:39 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: acme@...nel.org
Cc: jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf script: Fix --reltime with --time
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
My earlier patch to just enable --reltime with --time was a little too optimistic.
The --time parsing would accept absolute time, which is very confusing to the user.
Support relative time in --time parsing too. This only works with recent perf
record that records the first sample time. Otherwise we error out.
Fixes: 3714437d3fcc ("perf script: Allow --time with --reltime")
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 5 +++--
tools/perf/util/time-utils.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
tools/perf/util/time-utils.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
index 1c797a948ada..f86c5cce5b2c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
@@ -3864,10 +3864,11 @@ int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv)
goto out_delete;
if (script.time_str) {
- err = perf_time__parse_for_ranges(script.time_str, session,
+ err = perf_time__parse_for_ranges_reltime(script.time_str, session,
&script.ptime_range,
&script.range_size,
- &script.range_num);
+ &script.range_num,
+ reltime);
if (err < 0)
goto out_delete;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
index 9796a2e43f67..302443921681 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
@@ -458,10 +458,11 @@ bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
return true;
}
-int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
+int perf_time__parse_for_ranges_reltime(const char *time_str,
struct perf_session *session,
struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
- int *range_size, int *range_num)
+ int *range_size, int *range_num,
+ bool reltime)
{
bool has_percent = strchr(time_str, '%');
struct perf_time_interval *ptime_range;
@@ -471,7 +472,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
if (!ptime_range)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (has_percent) {
+ if (has_percent || reltime) {
if (session->evlist->first_sample_time == 0 &&
session->evlist->last_sample_time == 0) {
pr_err("HINT: no first/last sample time found in perf data.\n"
@@ -479,7 +480,9 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
"(if '--buildid-all' is enabled, please set '--timestamp-boundary').\n");
goto error;
}
+ }
+ if (has_percent) {
num = perf_time__percent_parse_str(
ptime_range, size,
time_str,
@@ -492,6 +495,15 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
if (num < 0)
goto error_invalid;
+ if (reltime) {
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+ ptime_range[i].start += session->evlist->first_sample_time;
+ ptime_range[i].end += session->evlist->first_sample_time;
+ }
+ }
+
*range_size = size;
*range_num = num;
*ranges = ptime_range;
@@ -504,6 +516,15 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
return ret;
}
+int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
+ struct perf_session *session,
+ struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
+ int *range_size, int *range_num)
+{
+ return perf_time__parse_for_ranges_reltime(time_str, session, ranges,
+ range_size, range_num, false);
+}
+
int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz)
{
u64 sec = timestamp / NSEC_PER_SEC;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
index 4f42988eb2f7..1142b0bddd5e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
struct perf_session;
+int perf_time__parse_for_ranges_reltime(const char *str, struct perf_session *session,
+ struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
+ int *range_size, int *range_num,
+ bool reltime);
+
int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *str, struct perf_session *session,
struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
int *range_size, int *range_num);
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists