[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191012070054.28657-1-swood@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 02:00:54 -0500
From: Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/smp: Enforce limit of 512 cpus with MAXSMP and no CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
The help text of NR_CPUS says that the maximum number of cpus supported
without CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is 512. However, NR_CPUS_RANGE_END allows this
limit to be bypassed by MAXSMP even if CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is not set.
This scenario can currently only happen in the RT tree, since it
has "select CPUMASK_OFFSTACK if !PREEMPT_RT_FULL" in MAXSMP. However,
even if we ignore the RT tree, checking for MAXSMP in addition to
CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index d6e1faa28c58..2b526e101dc9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1000,8 +1000,8 @@ config NR_CPUS_RANGE_END
config NR_CPUS_RANGE_END
int
depends on X86_64
- default 8192 if SMP && ( MAXSMP || CPUMASK_OFFSTACK)
- default 512 if SMP && (!MAXSMP && !CPUMASK_OFFSTACK)
+ default 8192 if SMP && CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
+ default 512 if SMP && !CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
default 1 if !SMP
config NR_CPUS_DEFAULT
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists