[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0284a24-08f9-01da-98d9-366a45c3c8ff@web.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 20:04:57 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>, Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>
Subject: pinctrl: lantiq: Checking two kmemdup() calls in
ltq_pinctrl_dt_subnode_to_map()
Hello,
I tried another script for the semantic patch language out.
This source code analysis approach points out that the implementation
of the function “ltq_pinctrl_dt_subnode_to_map” contains still
two unchecked calls of the function “kmemdup”.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lantiq.c?id=1c0cc5f1ae5ee5a6913704c0d75a6e99604ee30a#n116
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.4-rc2/source/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c#L476
How do you think about to improve it?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists