[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191012044430.GG2689@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:44:30 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: add declarations of undeclared items
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:08:24PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> The rcu_state, rcu_rnp_online_cpus and rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs
> do not have declarations in a header. Add these to remove the
> following sparse warnings:
>
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:87:18: warning: symbol 'rcu_state' was not declared. Should it be static?
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:191:15: warning: symbol 'rcu_rnp_online_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:297:6: warning: symbol 'rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Good catch!
However, these guys (plus one more) are actually used only in the
kernel/rcu/tree.o translation unit, so they can be marked static.
I made this change as shown below with your Reported-by.
Seem reasonable?
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit 02995691aa76f3e52599d4f9d9d1ab23c3574f32
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Date: Fri Oct 11 21:40:09 2019 -0700
rcu: Mark non-global functions and variables as static
Each of rcu_state, rcu_rnp_online_cpus(), rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(),
and rcu_dynticks_snap() are used only in the kernel/rcu/tree.o translation
unit, and may thus be marked static. This commit therefore makes this
change.
Reported-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index b18fa3d..278798e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rcu_data, rcu_data) = {
.dynticks_nmi_nesting = DYNTICK_IRQ_NONIDLE,
.dynticks = ATOMIC_INIT(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR),
};
-struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
+static struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
.level = { &rcu_state.node[0] },
.gp_state = RCU_GP_IDLE,
.gp_seq = (0UL - 300UL) << RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT,
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_get_gp_kthreads_prio);
* held, but the bit corresponding to the current CPU will be stable
* in most contexts.
*/
-unsigned long rcu_rnp_online_cpus(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+static unsigned long rcu_rnp_online_cpus(struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
return READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmaskinitnext);
}
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void rcu_dynticks_eqs_online(void)
*
* No ordering, as we are sampling CPU-local information.
*/
-bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
+static bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
* Snapshot the ->dynticks counter with full ordering so as to allow
* stable comparison of this counter with past and future snapshots.
*/
-int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+static int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
int snap = atomic_add_return(0, &rdp->dynticks);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 1540542..f8e6c70 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -402,8 +402,6 @@ static const char *tp_rcu_varname __used __tracepoint_string = rcu_name;
#define RCU_NAME rcu_name
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING */
-int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_data *rdp);
-
/* Forward declarations for tree_plugin.h */
static void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
static void rcu_qs(void);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists