linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Lower throttling MCE messages to warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1eab3630-30d7-ff8f-8da6-aa9fc5c17f34@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:35:08 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Benjamin Berg <bberg@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christian Kellner <ckellner@...hat.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Lower throttling MCE messages to warnings

Hi Benjamin,

On 09-10-2019 17:54, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> On modern CPUs it is quite normal that the temperature limits are
> reached and the CPU is throttled. In fact, often the thermal design is
> not sufficient to cool the CPU at full load and limits can quickly be
> reached when a burst in load happens. This will even happen with
> technologies like RAPL limitting the long term power consumption of
> the package.
> 
> So these messages do not usually indicate a hardware issue (e.g.
> insufficient cooling). Log them as warnings to avoid confusion about
> their severity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <bberg@...hat.com>
> Tested-by: Christian Kellner <ckellner@...hat.com>

This seems like the exact same patch as you send before, is there
any reason for this resend ?

Regards,

Hans


> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/therm_throt.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/therm_throt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/therm_throt.c
> index 6e2becf547c5..bc441d68d060 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/therm_throt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/therm_throt.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static void therm_throt_process(bool new_event, int event, int level)
>   	/* if we just entered the thermal event */
>   	if (new_event) {
>   		if (event == THERMAL_THROTTLING_EVENT)
> -			pr_crit("CPU%d: %s temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = %lu)\n",
> +			pr_warn("CPU%d: %s temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = %lu)\n",
>   				this_cpu,
>   				level == CORE_LEVEL ? "Core" : "Package",
>   				state->count);
>