linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3 v3] x86/kdump: clean up all the code related to the backup region

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 13 Oct 2019 17:36:28 +0800
From:   lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, bhe@...hat.com,
        jgross@...e.com, dhowells@...hat.com, Thomas.Lendacky@....com,
        vgoyal@...hat.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v3] x86/kdump: clean up all the code related to the
 backup region

在 2019年10月13日 11:54, Eric W. Biederman 写道:
> Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> writes:
> 
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 10/12/19 at 06:26am, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> When the crashkernel kernel command line option is specified, the
>>>> low 1MiB memory will always be reserved, which makes that the memory
>>>> allocated later won't fall into the low 1MiB area, thereby, it's not
>>>> necessary to create a backup region and also no need to copy the first
>>>> 640k content to a backup region.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, the code related to the backup region can be safely removed,
>>>> so lets clean up.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
>>>> index eb651fbde92a..cc5774fc84c0 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
>>>> @@ -173,8 +173,6 @@ void native_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>>  
>>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
>>>>  
>>>> -static unsigned long crash_zero_bytes;
>>>> -
>>>>  static int get_nr_ram_ranges_callback(struct resource *res, void *arg)
>>>>  {
>>>>  	unsigned int *nr_ranges = arg;
>>>> @@ -234,9 +232,15 @@ static int prepare_elf64_ram_headers_callback(struct resource *res, void *arg)
>>>>  {
>>>>  	struct crash_mem *cmem = arg;
>>>>  
>>>> -	cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = res->start;
>>>> -	cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = res->end;
>>>> -	cmem->nr_ranges++;
>>>> +	if (res->start >= SZ_1M) {
>>>> +		cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = res->start;
>>>> +		cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = res->end;
>>>> +		cmem->nr_ranges++;
>>>> +	} else if (res->end > SZ_1M) {
>>>> +		cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = SZ_1M;
>>>> +		cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = res->end;
>>>> +		cmem->nr_ranges++;
>>>> +	}
>>>
>>> What is going on with this chunk?  I can guess but this needs a clear
>>> comment.
>>
>> Indeed it needs some code comment, this is based on some offline
>> discussion.  cat /proc/vmcore will give a warning because ioremap is
>> mapping the system ram.
>>
>> We pass the first 1M to kdump kernel in e820 as system ram so that 2nd
>> kernel can use the low 1M memory because for example the trampoline
>> code.
>>
>>>
>>>>  
>>>>  	return 0;
>>>>  }
>>>
>>>> @@ -356,9 +337,12 @@ int crash_setup_memmap_entries(struct kimage *image, struct boot_params *params)
>>>>  	memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct crash_memmap_data));
>>>>  	cmd.params = params;
>>>>  
>>>> -	/* Add first 640K segment */
>>>> -	ei.addr = image->arch.backup_src_start;
>>>> -	ei.size = image->arch.backup_src_sz;
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * Add the low memory range[0x1000, SZ_1M], skip
>>>> +	 * the first zero page.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	ei.addr = PAGE_SIZE;
>>>> +	ei.size = SZ_1M - PAGE_SIZE;
>>>>  	ei.type = E820_TYPE_RAM;
>>>>  	add_e820_entry(params, &ei);
>>>
>>> Likewise here.  Why do we need a special case?
>>> Why the magic with PAGE_SIZE?
>>
>> Good catch, the zero page part is useless, I think no other special
>> reason, just assumed zero page is not usable, but it should be ok to
>> remove the special handling, just pass 0 - 1M is good enough.
> 
> But if we have stopped special casing the low 1M.  Why do we need a
> special case here at all?
> 
Here, need to pass the low memory range to kdump kernel, which will guarantee
the availability of low memory in kdump kernel, otherwise, kdump kernel won't
use the low memory region.

> If you need the special case it is almost certainly wrong to say you
> have ram above 640KiB and below 1MiB.  That is the legacy ROM and video
> MMIO area.
> 
> There is a reason the original code said 640KiB.
> 
Do you mean that the 640k region is good enough here instead of 1MiB?

Thanks.
Lianbo

> Eric
>