linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds: tlc591xx: update the maximum brightness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:45:08 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Cc:     Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...com>, dmurphy@...com,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: tlc591xx: update the maximum brightness

Hi!

> > @@ -112,11 +113,11 @@ tlc591xx_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> >  	struct tlc591xx_priv *priv = led->priv;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> > -	switch (brightness) {
> > +	switch ((int)brightness) {
> >  	case 0:

Can we get a rid of the cast here? Do we need to move away from the
enum for the brightness?

> Added tag:
> 
> Fixes: e370d010a5fe ("leds: tlc591xx: Driver for the TI 8/16 Channel i2c
> LED driver")
> 
> and applied to the for-5.5 branch.

Actually, careful with the Fixes tag. -stable people will want to
apply it, and it may not be a good idea in this case. Maximum
brightness of 256 is pretty unusual, so I'd call this "a bit risky".

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)