[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191014073720.GH32742@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:37:20 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/14] software node: rename is_array to is_inline
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:07:17PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> We do not need a special flag to know if we are dealing with an array,
> as we can get that data from ratio between element length and the data
> size, however we do need a flag to know whether the data is stored
> directly inside property_entry or separately.
> - if (prop->is_array)
> + if (!prop->is_inline)
> - if (p->is_array) {
> + if (!p->is_inline) {
> - if (src->is_array) {
> + if (!src->is_inline) {
May we have positive conditionals instead?
> + * @is_inline: True when the property value is stored directly in
I think word 'directly' is superfluous here.
Or, perhaps, 'stored directly' -> 'embedded'
> + * &struct property_entry instance.
> + * @pointer: Pointer to the property when it is stored separately from
> + * the &struct property_entry instance.
'separately from' -> 'outside' ?
> + * @value: Value of the property when it is stored inline.
'stored inline' -> 'embedded in the &struct...' ?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists