[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191014100427.GA6307@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:04:27 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, rth@...ddle.net,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
dalias@...c.org, davem@...emloft.net, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org, jiaxun.yang@...goat.com,
chenhc@...ote.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, cai@....pw,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
luto@...nel.org, len.brown@...el.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
dledford@...hat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, tbogendoerfer@...e.de,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:49:12AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > Good luck, I don't really think that most, if any, of this is needed,
> > but hey, it's nice to clean it up where it can be :)
>
> Some of the virtual devices we have (that use devm) really ought to set
> the node too, like drivers/base/cpu.c and driver/base/node.c and
> arguably the cooling devices too (they create a device per cpu).
>
> The patch I had here:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190925214526.GA4643@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
>
> takes the more radical approach of requiring a node, except when
> explicitly marked not (the fake devices that don't use devm for
> example).
I like that patch :)
> But yes, PCI and other physical busses really should be having a node
> set, no excuses.
Agreed, at least just warning on the bus creation will make it a bit
less "noisy", in contrast to your patch. But the messages in your patch
show people just how broken their bioses really are. Which is always
fun...
> Anyway, I don't think non-physical devices actually use
> cpumask_of_node() much, a quick grep didn't show any.
That's good.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists