[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191014145315.GZ2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:53:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, qperret@...rret.net,
patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, dh.han@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:44:54PM +0100, Douglas RAILLARD wrote:
> This has been ligthly tested with a rtapp task ramping from 10% to 75%
> utilisation on a big core. Results are improved by fast ramp-up
> EWMA [1], since it greatly reduces the oscillation in frequency at first
> idle when ramping up.
>
> [1] [PATCH] sched/fair: util_est: fast ramp-up EWMA on utilization increases
> Message-ID: <20190620150555.15717-1-patrick.bellasi@....com>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190620150555.15717-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com/
I don't really see anything fundamentally weird here. Any actual numbers
or other means of quantifying the improvement these patches bring?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists