[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201910142340.H1Itv6kZ%lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:04:27 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Pankaj Sharma <pankj.sharma@...sung.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wg@...ndegger.com, mkl@...gutronix.de, davem@...emloft.net,
eugen.hristev@...rochip.com, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
pankaj.dubey@...sung.com, rcsekar@...sung.com,
Pankaj Sharma <pankj.sharma@...sung.com>,
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: m_can: add support for handling arbitration error
Hi Pankaj,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on net/master]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc3 next-20191014]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pankaj-Sharma/can-m_can-add-support-for-handling-arbitration-error/20191014-193532
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c:783:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'is_protocol_err' with return type bool
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists