linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] powerpc/prom_init: Use -ffreestanding to avoid a reference to bcmp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmcUT2A9FG0JD9jd0s=gAavRc_h+RLG6O3mBz4P1FfF8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:56:12 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] powerpc/prom_init: Use -ffreestanding to avoid a
 reference to bcmp

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:35 AM Segher Boessenkool
<segher@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 07:51:01PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > r374662 gives LLVM the ability to convert certain loops into a reference
> > to bcmp as an optimization; this breaks prom_init_check.sh:
>
> When/why does LLVM think this is okay?  This function has been removed
> from POSIX over a decade ago (and before that it always was marked as
> legacy).

Segher, do you have links for any of the above? If so, that would be
helpful to me. I'm arguing against certain transforms that assume that
one library function is faster than another, when such claims are
based on measurements from one stdlib implementation. (There's others
in the pipeline I'm not too thrilled about, too).

The rationale for why it was added was that memcmp takes a measurable
amount of time in Google's fleet, and most calls to memcmp don't care
about the position of the mismatch; bcmp is lower overhead (or at
least for our libc implementation, not sure about others).
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers