linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191014165438.GB105106@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:54:38 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        primiano@...gle.com, rsavitski@...gle.com, jeffv@...gle.com,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:35:44AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:03:30PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> 
> > @@ -4761,6 +4762,7 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct perf_event *event)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  no_ctx:
> > +	security_perf_event_free(event);
> >  	put_event(event); /* Must be the 'last' reference */
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> 
> > @@ -10553,11 +10568,16 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int cpu,
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	err = security_perf_event_alloc(event);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		goto err_security;
> > +
> >  	/* symmetric to unaccount_event() in _free_event() */
> >  	account_event(event);
> >  
> >  	return event;
> >  
> > +err_security:
> >  err_addr_filters:
> >  	kfree(event->addr_filter_ranges);
> >  
> 
> There's a bunch of problems here I think:
> 
>  - err_security is named wrong; the naming scheme is to name the label
>    after the last thing that succeeded / first thing that needs to be
>    undone.
> 
>  - per that, you're forgetting to undo 'get_callchain_buffers()'

Yes, you're right. Tested your fix below. Sorry to miss this.

>  - perf_event_release_kernel() is not a full match to
>    perf_event_alloc(), inherited events get created by
>    perf_event_alloc() but never pass through
>    perf_event_release_kernel().

Oh, through inherit_event(). Thanks for pointing this semantic out, did not
know that.

> I'm thinking the below patch on top should ammend these issues; please
> verify.

Yes, applied your diff below and verified that the events are getting freed
as they were in my initial set of tests. The diff also looks good to me.

I squashed your diff below and will resend as v3. Since you modified this
patch a lot, I will add your Co-developed-by tag as well.

thanks, Peter!

 - Joel


> ---
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -4540,6 +4540,8 @@ static void _free_event(struct perf_even
>  
>  	unaccount_event(event);
>  
> +	security_perf_event_free(event);
> +
>  	if (event->rb) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Can happen when we close an event with re-directed output.
> @@ -4774,7 +4776,6 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct per
>  	}
>  
>  no_ctx:
> -	security_perf_event_free(event);
>  	put_event(event); /* Must be the 'last' reference */
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -10595,14 +10596,18 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr
>  
>  	err = security_perf_event_alloc(event);
>  	if (err)
> -		goto err_security;
> +		goto err_callchain_buffer;
>  
>  	/* symmetric to unaccount_event() in _free_event() */
>  	account_event(event);
>  
>  	return event;
>  
> -err_security:
> +err_callchain_buffer:
> +	if (!event->parent) {
> +		if (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN)
> +			put_callchain_buffers();
> +	}
>  err_addr_filters:
>  	kfree(event->addr_filter_ranges);
>