[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191014211825.GJ4715@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:18:25 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86, efi: never relocate kernel below lowest
acceptable address
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:21:11PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Was there a section in the patch submission documentation to point out
> when people send patches with all the possible twists for an acronym?
I don't think so.
> This is giving me constantly gray hairs with TPM patches.
Well, I'm slowly getting tired of repeating the same crap over and over
again about how important it is to document one's changes and to write
good commit messages. The most repeated answers I'm simply putting into
canned reply templates because, well, saying it once or twice is not
enough anymore. :-\
And yeah, I see your pain. Same here, actually.
In the acronym case, I'd probably add a regex to my patch massaging
script and convert those typos automatically and be done with it.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists