[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191014154423.a472315834ce6a730ccbaf3f@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:44:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
etnaviv@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memblock: do not enforce current limit for
memblock_phys* family
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 00:31:01 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
> Until commit 92d12f9544b7 ("memblock: refactor internal allocation
> functions") the maximal address for memblock allocations was forced to
> memblock.current_limit only for the allocation functions returning virtual
> address. The changes introduced by that commit moved the limit enforcement
> into the allocation core and as a result the allocation functions returning
> physical address also started to limit allocations to
> memblock.current_limit.
>
> This caused breakage of etnaviv GPU driver:
>
> ...
>
So I'll add a cc:stable, yes?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists