| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2040eac0-01f6-9a6f-2254-40e484fb3cd3@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:53:49 -0700
From: Divya Indi <divya.indi@...cle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>,
Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@...cle.com>,
Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@...cle.com>,
Manjunath Patil <manjunath.b.patil@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Sample module to demonstrate kernel access to
Ftrace instances.
[Apologies for multiple resends, formatting issue]
Hi Steven,
Thanks for taking a look.
This sample module is dependent on -
- commit: f45d122 tracing: Kernel access to Ftrace instances
- Patches pending review: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1565805327-579-1-git-send-email-divya.indi@oracle.com/
I mentioned it in the cover page, but will add to this patch as well to avoid confusion.
So, I think the messages you are seeing is due to the absence of
Patches pending review: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1565805327-579-1-git-send-email-divya.indi@oracle.com/
Let me know if you prefer to have the sample module and this patch-set (pending review) as part of one patch set.
For reference, adding the cover page details here -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This patch is for a sample module to demonstrate the use of APIs that
were introduced/exported in order to access Ftrace instances from within the kernel.
Please Note: This module is dependent on -
- commit: f45d122 tracing: Kernel access to Ftrace instances
- Patches pending review: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1565805327-579-1-git-send-email-divya.indi@oracle.com/
The sample module creates/lookup a trace array called sample-instance on module load time.
We then start a kernel thread(simple-thread) to -
1) Enable tracing for event "sample_event" to buffer associated with the trace array - "sample-instance".
2) Start a timer that will disable tracing to this buffer after 5 sec. (Tracing disabled after 5 sec ie at count=4)
3) Write to the buffer using trace_array_printk()
4) Stop the kernel thread and destroy the buffer during module unload.
A sample output for the same -
# tracer: nop
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 16/16 #P:4
#
# _-----=> irqs-off
# / _----=> need-resched
# | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
# || / _--=> preempt-depth
# ||| / delay
# TASK-PID CPU# |||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
# | | | |||| | |
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955180.489833: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=0
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955180.489836: sample_event: count value=0 at jiffies=5249940864
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955181.513722: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=1
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955181.513724: sample_event: count value=1 at jiffies=5249941888
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955182.537629: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=2
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955182.537631: sample_event: count value=2 at jiffies=5249942912
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955183.561516: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=3
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955183.561518: sample_event: count value=3 at jiffies=5249943936
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955184.585423: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=4
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955184.585427: sample_event: count value=4 at jiffies=5249944960
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955185.609344: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=5
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955186.633241: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=6
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955187.657157: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=7
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955188.681039: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=8
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955189.704937: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=9
sample-instance-26797 [003] .... 955190.728840: simple_thread: trace_array_printk: count=10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Divya
On 10/15/19 10:05 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:59:26 -0700
> Divya Indi <divya.indi@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>> This is a sample module to demostrate the use of the newly introduced and
>> exported APIs to access Ftrace instances from within the kernel.
>>
>> Newly introduced APIs used here -
>>
>> 1. Create a new trace array if it does not exist.
>> struct trace_array *trace_array_create(const char *name)
>>
>> 2. Destroy/Remove a trace array.
>> int trace_array_destroy(struct trace_array *tr)
>>
>> 3. Lookup a trace array, given its name.
>> struct trace_array *trace_array_lookup(const char *name)
>>
>> 4. Enable/Disable trace events:
>> int trace_array_set_clr_event(struct trace_array *tr, const char *system,
>> const char *event, int set);
>>
>> Exported APIs -
>> 1. trace_printk equivalent for instances.
>> int trace_array_printk(struct trace_array *tr,
>> unsigned long ip, const char *fmt, ...);
>>
>> 2. Helper function.
>> void trace_printk_init_buffers(void);
>>
>> 3. To decrement the reference counter.
>> void trace_array_put(struct trace_array *tr)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Divya Indi <divya.indi@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Manjunath Patil <manjunath.b.patil@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> samples/Kconfig | 7 ++
>> samples/Makefile | 1 +
>> samples/ftrace_instance/Makefile | 6 ++
>> samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.h | 84 +++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 232 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 samples/ftrace_instance/Makefile
>> create mode 100644 samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c
>> create mode 100644 samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.h
>>
> I applied this patch but get this:
>
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c: In function ‘mytimer_handler’:
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c:35:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_array_set_clr_event’; did you mean ‘trace_set_clr_event’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> trace_array_set_clr_event(tr, "sample-subsystem", "sample_event", 0);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> trace_set_clr_event
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c: In function ‘simple_thread_func’:
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c:47:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_array_printk’; did you mean ‘trace_seq_printf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> trace_array_printk(tr, _THIS_IP_, "trace_array_printk: count=%d\n",
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> trace_seq_printf
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c: In function ‘simple_thread’:
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c:85:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_array_put’; did you mean ‘trace_seq_putc’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> trace_array_put(tr);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> trace_seq_putc
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c: In function ‘sample_trace_array_init’:
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c:100:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_array_lookup’; did you mean ‘radix_tree_lookup’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> tr = trace_array_lookup("sample-instance");
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> radix_tree_lookup
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c:100:5: warning: assignment to ‘struct trace_array *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> tr = trace_array_lookup("sample-instance");
> ^
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c:102:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_array_create’; did you mean ‘ftrace_force_update’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> tr = trace_array_create("sample-instance");
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ftrace_force_update
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c:102:6: warning: assignment to ‘struct trace_array *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> tr = trace_array_create("sample-instance");
> ^
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c:110:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_printk_init_buffers’; did you mean ‘trace_event_get_offsets’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> trace_printk_init_buffers();
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> trace_event_get_offsets
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c: In function ‘sample_trace_array_exit’:
> /work/git/linux-trace.git/samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.c:126:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘trace_array_destroy’; did you mean ‘assoc_array_destroy’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> trace_array_destroy(tr);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> assoc_array_destroy
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [/work/git/linux-trace.git/scripts/Makefile.build:266: samples/ftrace_instance/sample-trace-array.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [/work/git/linux-trace.git/scripts/Makefile.build:509: samples/ftrace_instance] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [/work/git/linux-trace.git/Makefile:1650: samples] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
>
> -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists