[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191015135545.9a9234b05067a564f1fbd69d@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:55:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Don't complain about nominal authors if
there isn't one
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:34:28 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 10:22 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 16:55 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > checkpatch.pl shouldn't warn about a "Missing Signed-off-by: line by
> > > > nominal patch author" if there is no nominal patch author. Without
> > > > this change, checkpatch always gives me the following warning:
> > > >
> > > > WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author ''
> > >
> > > When/how does this occur? Example please.
> >
> > The patch itself is a good example. Attached to this email is the
> > patch file in the form I keep it (from quilt, not git; note that quilt
> > doesn't do a good job of handling the "---" line so I leave it out and
> > insert it when submitting the patch). Try saving the attachment and
> > running it through checkpatch.pl. Here's what I get:
>
> Andrew?
>
> Does checkpatch emit this warning for you on
> your quilt content?
Nope. All my patches always have From: and Subject: at the start of
changelog.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists