linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Add support for arm64 to carry ima measurement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:15:39 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>
cc:     prsriva <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, jean-philippe@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
        takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, duwe@....de, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, allison@...utok.net, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Add support for arm64 to carry ima measurement

On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, James Morse wrote:

> > The IMA logs are event logs for module load time signature validation(based on policies)
> > which are backed by the TPM. No SecureBoot information is present in the log other than
> > the boot aggregate.
> 
> Okay, so SecureBoot is optional with this thing.

Correct. Verified boot is one alternative.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>