linux-kernel - [PATCH] rcu: rcu_segcblist.c make undeclared items static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191015105524.1676-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Date:   Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:55:24 +0100
From:   Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk
Cc:     Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: rcu_segcblist.c make undeclared items static

The following are not used outside the unit they are
declared in, so make them static to avoid the following
sparse warnings:

kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c:91:6: warning: symbol 'rcu_segcblist_set_len' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c:107:6: warning: symbol 'rcu_segcblist_add_len' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'rcu_segcblist_xchg_len' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
---
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
 kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
index 495c58ce1640..cbc87b804db9 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ struct rcu_head *rcu_cblist_dequeue(struct rcu_cblist *rclp)
 }
 
 /* Set the length of an rcu_segcblist structure. */
-void rcu_segcblist_set_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+static void rcu_segcblist_set_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
 	atomic_long_set(&rsclp->len, v);
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_set_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
  * This increase is fully ordered with respect to the callers accesses
  * both before and after.
  */
-void rcu_segcblist_add_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+static void rcu_segcblist_add_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
 	smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* Up to the caller! */
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_inc_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
  * with the actual number of callbacks on the structure.  This exchange is
  * fully ordered with respect to the callers accesses both before and after.
  */
-long rcu_segcblist_xchg_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+static long rcu_segcblist_xchg_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
 	return atomic_long_xchg(&rsclp->len, v);
-- 
2.23.0