[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3a1a3d9-5d3a-3ab3-0eaf-e63e0c401c99@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:58:34 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/topology: Allow sched_asym_cpucapacity to be
disabled
On 15/10/2019 11:40, Quentin Perret wrote:
>> @@ -2124,8 +2124,17 @@ static void detach_destroy_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
>> int i;
>>
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> +
>> + if (static_key_enabled(&sched_asym_cpucapacity)) {
>> + unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any(cpu_map);
>> +
>> + if (rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu)))
>> + static_branch_dec_cpuslocked(&sched_asym_cpucapacity);
>
> Lockdep should scream for this :)
Bleh, yes indeed...
>> + }
>> +
>> for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map)
>> cpu_attach_domain(NULL, &def_root_domain, i);
>> +
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.22.0
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists