[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191015120726.GG32742@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:07:26 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/14] software node: clean up
property_copy_string_array()
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Because property_copy_string_array() stores the newly allocated pointer in the
> destination property, we have an awkward code in property_entry_copy_data()
> where we fetch the new pointer from dst.
I don't see a problem in this function.
Rather 'awkward code' is a result of use property_set_pointer() which relies on
data type.
> Let's change property_copy_string_array() to return pointer and rely on the
> common path in property_entry_copy_data() to store it in destination structure.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists