linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] mdev: class id support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <084c7e28-8578-51f3-7b31-2231de8c636d@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:12:33 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, tiwei.bie@...el.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        maxime.coquelin@...hat.com, cunming.liang@...el.com,
        zhihong.wang@...el.com, rob.miller@...adcom.com,
        xiao.w.wang@...el.com, haotian.wang@...ive.com,
        zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com,
        jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
        rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
        farman@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, sebott@...ux.ibm.com,
        oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com,
        freude@...ux.ibm.com, lingshan.zhu@...el.com, idos@...lanox.com,
        eperezma@...hat.com, lulu@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com,
        christophe.de.dinechin@...il.com, kevin.tian@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] mdev: class id support


On 2019/10/15 下午6:26, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:15:51 +0800
> Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Mdev bus only supports vfio driver right now, so it doesn't implement
>> match method. But in the future, we may add drivers other than vfio,
>> the first driver could be virtio-mdev. This means we need to add
>> device class id support in bus match method to pair the mdev device
>> and mdev driver correctly.
>>
>> So this patch adds id_table to mdev_driver and class_id for mdev
>> device with the match method for mdev bus.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/driver-api/vfio-mediated-device.rst |  7 ++++++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c                  |  1 +
>>   drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c                   |  1 +
>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c                 |  1 +
>>   drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c                     | 11 +++++++++++
>>   drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_driver.c                   | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_private.h                  |  1 +
>>   drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c                     |  6 ++++++
>>   include/linux/mdev.h                              |  8 ++++++++
>>   include/linux/mod_devicetable.h                   |  8 ++++++++
>>   samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                        |  1 +
>>   samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                          |  1 +
>>   samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                          |  1 +
>>   13 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio-mediated-device.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio-mediated-device.rst
>> index 25eb7d5b834b..2035e48da7b2 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio-mediated-device.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio-mediated-device.rst
>> @@ -102,12 +102,14 @@ structure to represent a mediated device's driver::
>>         * @probe: called when new device created
>>         * @remove: called when device removed
>>         * @driver: device driver structure
>> +      * @id_table: the ids serviced by this driver
>>         */
>>        struct mdev_driver {
>>   	     const char *name;
>>   	     int  (*probe)  (struct device *dev);
>>   	     void (*remove) (struct device *dev);
>>   	     struct device_driver    driver;
>> +	     const struct mdev_class_id *id_table;
>>        };
>>   
>>   A mediated bus driver for mdev should use this structure in the function calls
>> @@ -165,12 +167,15 @@ register itself with the mdev core driver::
>>   	extern int  mdev_register_device(struct device *dev,
>>   	                                 const struct mdev_parent_ops *ops);
>>   
>> +It is also required to specify the class_id through::
>> +
>> +	extern int mdev_set_class(struct device *dev, u16 id);
> Should the document state explicitly that this should be done in the
> ->create() callback?


Yes, it's better.


> Also, I think that the class_id might be different
> for different mdevs (even if the parent is the same) -- should that be
> mentioned explicitly?


Yes, depends on the mdev_supported_type.

Thanks


>
>> +
>>   However, the mdev_parent_ops structure is not required in the function call
>>   that a driver should use to unregister itself with the mdev core driver::
>>   
>>   	extern void mdev_unregister_device(struct device *dev);
>>   
>> -
>>   Mediated Device Management Interface Through sysfs
>>   ==================================================
>>   
> (...)
>
> Looks reasonable to me.