[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191015170450.GB5444@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:04:50 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
David Safford <david.safford@...com>,
Pascal Van Leeuwen <pvanleeuwen@...imatrix.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Salt tpm_get_random() result with get_random_bytes()
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 03:47:02PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Salt the result that comes from the TPM RNG with random bytes from the
> kernel RNG. This will allow to use tpm_get_random() as a substitute for
> get_random_bytes(). TPM could have a bug (making results predicatable),
> backdoor or even an inteposer in the bus. Salting gives protections
> against these concerns.
Seems like a dangerous use case, why would any kernel user that cared
about quality of randomness ever call a tpm_* API to get quality
random data?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists