linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 03/14] efi/apple-properties: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191015180236.GB105649@dtor-ws>
Date:   Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:02:36 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/14] efi/apple-properties: use
 PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY_LEN

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 03:01:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:07:10PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Let's switch to using PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY_LEN() to initialize
> > property entries. Also, when dumping data, rely on local variables
> > instead of poking into the property entry structure directly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/efi/apple-properties.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/apple-properties.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/apple-properties.c
> > index 0e206c9e0d7a..5ccf39986a14 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/apple-properties.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/apple-properties.c
> > @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ static void __init unmarshal_key_value_pairs(struct dev_header *dev_header,
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < dev_header->prop_count; i++) {
> >  		int remaining = dev_header->len - (ptr - (void *)dev_header);
> > -		u32 key_len, val_len;
> > +		u32 key_len, val_len, entry_len;
> > +		const u8 *entry_data;
> >  		char *key;
> >  
> >  		if (sizeof(key_len) > remaining)
> > @@ -85,17 +86,14 @@ static void __init unmarshal_key_value_pairs(struct dev_header *dev_header,
> >  		ucs2_as_utf8(key, ptr + sizeof(key_len),
> >  			     key_len - sizeof(key_len));
> >  
> > -		entry[i].name = key;
> > -		entry[i].length = val_len - sizeof(val_len);
> > -		entry[i].is_array = !!entry[i].length;
> > -		entry[i].type = DEV_PROP_U8;
> > -		entry[i].pointer.u8_data = ptr + key_len + sizeof(val_len);
> > -
> > +		entry_data = ptr + key_len + sizeof(val_len);
> > +		entry_len = val_len - sizeof(val_len);
> > +		entry[i] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY_LEN(key, entry_data,
> > +						       entry_len);
> 
> I would rather leave on one line.

I am trying to stay withing 80 char limit by default, but do not have
strong opinion on the code I do not maintain. Up to Ard I suppose.

> Nevertheless,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Thank you for looking the patches over.

> 
> >  		if (dump_properties) {
> > -			dev_info(dev, "property: %s\n", entry[i].name);
> > +			dev_info(dev, "property: %s\n", key);
> >  			print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, pr_fmt(), DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
> > -				16, 1, entry[i].pointer.u8_data,
> > -				entry[i].length, true);
> > +				16, 1, entry_data, entry_len, true);
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		ptr += key_len + val_len;
> > -- 
> > 2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog
> > 
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry