linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] x86, efi: never relocate kernel below lowest acceptable address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fb0e7c13da405970d5cbd59c10005daaf970b8da.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:23:56 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86, efi: never relocate kernel below lowest
 acceptable address

On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 18:20 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:18:25PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:21:11PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > Was there a section in the patch submission documentation to point out
> > > when people send patches with all the possible twists for an acronym?
> > 
> > I don't think so.
> > 
> > > This is giving me constantly gray hairs with TPM patches.
> > 
> > Well, I'm slowly getting tired of repeating the same crap over and over
> > again about how important it is to document one's changes and to write
> > good commit messages. The most repeated answers I'm simply putting into
> > canned reply templates because, well, saying it once or twice is not
> > enough anymore. :-\
> > 
> > And yeah, I see your pain. Same here, actually.
> > 
> > In the acronym case, I'd probably add a regex to my patch massaging
> > script and convert those typos automatically and be done with it.
> 
> Wonder if checkpatch.pl could be extended to know acronyms e.g. have a
> db of known acronyms.

?  examples please.

checkpatch has a db for misspellings, I supposed another for
acronyms could be added, but how would false positives be avoided?