lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:08:19 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, michal.lkml@...kovi.net
Cc:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bfields@...ldses.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts : prune-kernel : prune kernels generalized way

On 10/15/19 11:13 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> This patch will remove old kernel from the system in a selective way.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
> ---
> Thanks, a bunch to Randy for the hand holding . :)

Hi Bhaskar,

First problem is that patch complains:

checking file scripts/prune-kernel
Using Plan A...
patch: **** malformed patch at line 87: 2.21.0

IOW, this patch does not apply cleanly.

More comments below.


>  scripts/prune-kernel | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/prune-kernel b/scripts/prune-kernel
> index e8aa940bc0a9..78dd4c854b2b 100755
> --- a/scripts/prune-kernel
> +++ b/scripts/prune-kernel
> @@ -5,17 +5,64 @@
>  # again, /boot and /lib/modules/ eventually fill up.
>  # Dumb script to purge that stuff:
> 
> +#for f in "$@"
> +#do
> +#        if rpm -qf "/lib/modules/$f" >/dev/null; then
> +#                echo "keeping $f (installed from rpm)"
> +#        elif [ $(uname -r) = "$f" ]; then
> +#                echo "keeping $f (running kernel) "
> +#        else
> +#                echo "removing $f"
> +#                rm -f "/boot/initramfs-$f.img" "/boot/System.map-$f"
> +#                rm -f "/boot/vmlinuz-$f"   "/boot/config-$f"
> +#                rm -rf "/lib/modules/$f"
> +#                new-kernel-pkg --remove $f
> +#        fi
> +#done
> +boot_dir=/boot
> +modules_dir=/lib/modules
> +
> +function remove_old_kernel(){
> +	cd $boot_dir
> +	rm -If vmlinuz-$kenrel_version System.map-$kernel_version config-$kernel_verison

Typos:
	               $kernel_version                                   $kernel_version

I.e., you can't have tested this.

> +}
> +function remove_old_kernel_modules_dir(){
> +	cd $modules_dir
> +	rm -rf $modules_version
> +}
> +printf "\n\n Enlist the installed kernels \n\n"
> +
> +find $boot_dir -name "vmlinuz-*" -type f  -exec ls -1 {} \;
> +
> +printf "\n\n\n Please give the kernel version to remove: %s"
> +read kernel_version
> +

If I enter nothing here, no need to call remove_old_kernel.

> +remove_old_kernel
> +
> +printf "\n\n Enlist the installed modules directory \n\n"
> +
> +find $modules_dir  -maxdepth 0 -type d -exec ls -1 {} \;
> +
> +printf "\n\n Please give the full modules directory name to remove: %s"
> +read modules_version

If I enter nothing here, don't call remove_old_kernel_modules_dir.

> +
> +remove_old_kernel_modules_dir
> +
> +printf "\n\n Removed kernel version: $kernel_version and associcated modules: $modules_version ...Done \n"

       typo:                                                associated

> +while :
>  do

Why is the "do" line missing a '+'?  The only do/done in the current script
are already listed above as being commented out.

> +printf "\n\n Do you want to remove another?[YN] : %s"
> +read response
> +
> +if [[ $response == "Y" ]];then
> +	printf "Please give another version to remove : %s"
> +	read kernel_version
> +	remove_old_kernel
> +	printf "\n\n Please give the full modules directory name to remove: %s"
> +	read modules_version
> +	remove_old_kernel_modules_dir
> +elif [[ $response == "N" ]];then
> +	printf "\n\n Alright,no more. \n\n"

Just exit, no printf needed.

> +	exit 1
> +fi
>  done

Same comment for "done" as for "do" above.

> --
> 2.21.0


-- 
~Randy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ