[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <307349e6-69b0-b894-a2b9-edfd5b0fe4c7@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:08:19 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, michal.lkml@...kovi.net
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bfields@...ldses.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts : prune-kernel : prune kernels generalized way
On 10/15/19 11:13 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> This patch will remove old kernel from the system in a selective way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
> ---
> Thanks, a bunch to Randy for the hand holding . :)
Hi Bhaskar,
First problem is that patch complains:
checking file scripts/prune-kernel
Using Plan A...
patch: **** malformed patch at line 87: 2.21.0
IOW, this patch does not apply cleanly.
More comments below.
> scripts/prune-kernel | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/prune-kernel b/scripts/prune-kernel
> index e8aa940bc0a9..78dd4c854b2b 100755
> --- a/scripts/prune-kernel
> +++ b/scripts/prune-kernel
> @@ -5,17 +5,64 @@
> # again, /boot and /lib/modules/ eventually fill up.
> # Dumb script to purge that stuff:
>
> +#for f in "$@"
> +#do
> +# if rpm -qf "/lib/modules/$f" >/dev/null; then
> +# echo "keeping $f (installed from rpm)"
> +# elif [ $(uname -r) = "$f" ]; then
> +# echo "keeping $f (running kernel) "
> +# else
> +# echo "removing $f"
> +# rm -f "/boot/initramfs-$f.img" "/boot/System.map-$f"
> +# rm -f "/boot/vmlinuz-$f" "/boot/config-$f"
> +# rm -rf "/lib/modules/$f"
> +# new-kernel-pkg --remove $f
> +# fi
> +#done
> +boot_dir=/boot
> +modules_dir=/lib/modules
> +
> +function remove_old_kernel(){
> + cd $boot_dir
> + rm -If vmlinuz-$kenrel_version System.map-$kernel_version config-$kernel_verison
Typos:
$kernel_version $kernel_version
I.e., you can't have tested this.
> +}
> +function remove_old_kernel_modules_dir(){
> + cd $modules_dir
> + rm -rf $modules_version
> +}
> +printf "\n\n Enlist the installed kernels \n\n"
> +
> +find $boot_dir -name "vmlinuz-*" -type f -exec ls -1 {} \;
> +
> +printf "\n\n\n Please give the kernel version to remove: %s"
> +read kernel_version
> +
If I enter nothing here, no need to call remove_old_kernel.
> +remove_old_kernel
> +
> +printf "\n\n Enlist the installed modules directory \n\n"
> +
> +find $modules_dir -maxdepth 0 -type d -exec ls -1 {} \;
> +
> +printf "\n\n Please give the full modules directory name to remove: %s"
> +read modules_version
If I enter nothing here, don't call remove_old_kernel_modules_dir.
> +
> +remove_old_kernel_modules_dir
> +
> +printf "\n\n Removed kernel version: $kernel_version and associcated modules: $modules_version ...Done \n"
typo: associated
> +while :
> do
Why is the "do" line missing a '+'? The only do/done in the current script
are already listed above as being commented out.
> +printf "\n\n Do you want to remove another?[YN] : %s"
> +read response
> +
> +if [[ $response == "Y" ]];then
> + printf "Please give another version to remove : %s"
> + read kernel_version
> + remove_old_kernel
> + printf "\n\n Please give the full modules directory name to remove: %s"
> + read modules_version
> + remove_old_kernel_modules_dir
> +elif [[ $response == "N" ]];then
> + printf "\n\n Alright,no more. \n\n"
Just exit, no printf needed.
> + exit 1
> +fi
> done
Same comment for "done" as for "do" above.
> --
> 2.21.0
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists