[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191016033814.GX2689@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:38:14 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] rcu: fix tracepoint string when RCU CPU kthread runs
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:23:57AM +0000, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> "rcu_wait" is incorrct here, use "rcu_run" instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 278798e58698..c351fc280945 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2485,7 +2485,7 @@ static void rcu_cpu_kthread(unsigned int cpu)
> int spincnt;
>
> for (spincnt = 0; spincnt < 10; spincnt++) {
> - trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start CPU kthread@..._wait"));
> + trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start CPU kthread@..._run"));
> local_bh_disable();
> *statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_RUNNING;
> local_irq_disable();
> @@ -2496,7 +2496,7 @@ static void rcu_cpu_kthread(unsigned int cpu)
> rcu_core();
> local_bh_enable();
> if (*workp == 0) {
> - trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End CPU kthread@..._wait"));
> + trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End CPU kthread@..._run"));
This one needs to stay as it was because this is where we wait when out
of work.
So I took the first hunk and dropped this second hunk.
Please let me know if I am missing something.
Thanx, Paul
> *statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_WAITING;
> return;
> }
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists