[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191016052535.GC2654@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:55:35 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: sc7180: Add minimal dts/dtsi files for
SC7180 soc
On 15-10-19, 16:03, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> + <GIC_PPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> + <GIC_PPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> + <GIC_PPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> + };
> +
> + clocks {
Can we have these sorted alphabetically please
> + xo_board: xo-board {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <38400000>;
> + clock-output-names = "xo_board";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <32764>;
> + clock-output-names = "sleep_clk";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + bi_tcxo: bi_tcxo {
why is this a clock defined here? Isnt this gcc clock?
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists