[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191016052716.yipztnpg7bcuzhfn@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:57:16 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/17] NVIDIA Tegra20 CPUFreq driver major update
On 16-10-19, 00:16, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This series moves intermediate-clk handling from tegra20-cpufreq into
> tegra-clk driver, this allows us to switch to generic cpufreq-dt driver
> which brings voltage scaling, per-hardware OPPs and Tegra30 support out
> of the box. All boards need to adopt CPU OPPs in their device-trees in
> order to get cpufreq support. This series adds OPPs only to selective
> boards because there is assumption in a current device-trees that CPU
> voltage is set for 1GHz freq and this won't work for those CPUs that
> can go over 1GHz and thus require voltage regulators to be set up for
> voltage scaling support (CC'ed Marcel for Toradex boards). We could
> probably add delete-node for OPPs over 1GHz if there are not actively
> maintained boards.
How do you want to get these patches merged ? Can I just pick the cpufreq bits
alone ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists