[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9641fbff-cfcd-4854-e0c9-0b97d44193ee@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:24:54 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
yangbo.lu@....com, john.stultz@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, maz@...nel.org,
richardcochran@...il.com, Mark.Rutland@....com, will@...nel.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Steve.Capper@....com, Kaly.Xin@....com, justin.he@....com,
nd@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] psci: Add hvc call service for ptp_kvm.
On 15/10/19 12:48, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 07e57a49d1e8..3597f1f27b10 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -1634,3 +1634,8 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> }
> TIMER_ACPI_DECLARE(arch_timer, ACPI_SIG_GTDT, arch_timer_acpi_init);
> #endif
> +
> +bool is_arm_arch_counter(void *cs)
> +{
> + return (struct clocksource *)cs == &clocksource_counter;
> +}
As Thomas pointed out, any reason to have a void * here?
However, since he didn't like modifying the struct, here is an
alternative idea:
1) add a "struct clocksource*" argument to ktime_get_snapshot
2) return -ENODEV if the argument is not NULL and is not the current
clocksource
3) move the implementation of the hypercall to
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c, so that it can call
ktime_get_snapshot(&systime_snapshot, &clocksource_counter);
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists